Statement
to the University of Toronto Governing Council March 23, 2006
David Naylor
A History of Diversity
For
decades, this University has placed a special emphasis on creating the
most
diverse academic community possible. We have done so because
outstanding
scholarship and outstanding teaching can only thrive in an environment
that
embraces the broadest range of people and encourages the free
expression of
their diverse perspectives.
Year
by year, we have succeeded in building a safe place for the widest
breadth of
communities, of experiences and thus inevitably, of ideas. By some
measures,
the University of
Toronto is now more diverse even than
Toronto itself. Continuing to advance that
achievement
remains our daily work.
A Current Strain
Thus,
it is also important for us to take note when part of our community
feels under
particular strain.
I
am concerned that a number of incidents in the past few weeks have made
the
current environment difficult for members of our Muslim community.
Misinformation about these incidents has only compounded that anxiety.
I am
disappointed that some members of our community have offered commentary
on
these distressing events that has not been particularly accurate or
helpful.
In
order to ensure the accuracy of this discussion, let
me describe the facts as we know them
about four incidents in particular and what the University’s response
has been:
On
March 7, a hijab-wearing
female UTM
student was followed into a bathroom at Hart House by another woman who
confronted her verbally and shoved a poster onto her chest. The poster
advertised a rally in support of the Danish cartoons that had portrayed
the
prophet Mohammed in a manner offensive to Muslims. The victim left the
bathroom, threw the poster in the garbage and rejoined her friend in
the Arbor
Room. The assailant followed her out of the bathroom, found her in the
Arbor
Room, and began to yell anti-Islamic epithets at the student and her
friend .
The
victim reported this incident to the campus police. Campus police sent
an
officer to Hart House, but didn’t find anyone matching the description
of the
assailant. The police continue to investigate this incident.
On
March 8, International Women’s Day,
student leaders from SAC were distributing Women’s Day leaflets on the
southeast corner of St. George and Bloor. Three eggs were dropped onto
the
group from the Woodsworth
College residence under which they were standing.
One egg
narrowly missed two Muslim women wearing hijab, who were there as part
of the
SAC group.
Campus
police responded immediately, and questioned people at the site.
However,
because no one claimed that they had been hit or specifically targeted,
the
police determined that they had no grounds to continue their
investigation.
Woodsworth is investigating to ascertain the identity of those involved
and
appropriate action will be taken by the College.
Two
Weeks Ago: Fliers
including one of the Danish cartoons
and statements that have caused offense to Muslims started to appear on
a
variety of locations around U of T and, apparently, around
York
University. U of T’s Anti Racism Office contacted
police and
asked them to take the fliers down treating them the way that we treat
all
offensive graffiti. Campus police forwarded the fliers to Toronto
Police. On
March 14, Toronto Police advised U of T that these fliers did not
constitute
hate literature, but also advised that the fliers were a “point of
interest”
for them.
On
March 20, Sunday,
an African-Canadian man
attending an Islamic theological
conference that had
rented space on campus was the victim of a
hit-and-run at Huron and Russell Streets, after a verbal confrontation
during
which the assailant had yelled racial epithets at the victim. The
victim was
taken to hospital for examination and observation and then released.
The
alleged assailant later turned himself into Toronto Police, who have
laid
charges for dangerous driving and assault. The assailant has been
released on
bail – with the condition that he stay away from the U of T campus.
The
victim was not a member of the U of T community. It is our
understanding that
the assailant is not a member of the U of T community. This did not
take place
in connection with any U of T programming
or
on U of T property, and we have seen no evidence to suggest that the
incident
had any connection to the Islamic conference happening nearby.
Nonetheless,
the University Administration feels a profound responsibility to ensure
a safe
environment on our campuses and we responded fully and quickly.
Immediately
upon learning of the incident, U of T Police sent five special
constables to
the conference with offers to escort attendees after the conference, if
they so
desired. U of T’s acting provost went to the conference immediately to
assist
attendees and police, and, the anti-racism officer went to the
conference to
speak with attendees and police.
Clearly,
these incidents take place in a setting of growing ethnic and religious
tensions
in Western society. That a university such as ours, which pursues
diversity as
a central tenet, should find itself a venue for the ugliest displays of
that
tension is perhaps inevitable.
It
is most certainly regrettable, and it is without question intolerable.
Other
Canadian universities have faced similar tensions in recent years. We,
like
they, can only respond to racism by confronting it directly,
prosecuting it
whenever warranted, protecting the safety of our members, and promoting
diversity with unwavering commitment. This University has long been and
remains
opposed to Islamophobia, anti-semitism, and every conceivable form of
discrimination based on race, religion or faith, or ethnocultural
identity.
Combating these myriad forms of racism and discrimination is the daily
work for many members of your administration, and it is a daily
commitment
made by countless members of the wider U of T community.
On
that point, I have to register concern at the way some individuals have
publicized the hit-and-run crime this weekend as linked to the
Islamophobic
incidents that clearly involved members of our University community.
The
struggle against racism is not advanced by commentary that fuels
anxieties or
that unfairly impugns the reputation for inclusivity of our remarkably
diverse
University community. In that respect, the Administration decided last
week to
proceed with a statement today, and we have been firm in not allowing
this
weekend’s unrelated incident to alter our timetable. My considered view is
that no
amount
of public rhetoric is a substitute for the private professionalism and
commitment demonstrated so abundantly by members of the Student Affairs
team
and our Campus Police in their interactions with victims of
discrimination and
their outreach to members of the affected communities.
Last
Friday, I had the honour to attend Muslim Jumma prayers at Hart House –
where
they have been held for over forty years. In speaking with members of
our
community there, I underscored the fact that the University of Toronto
is their
home; that Muslim students, faculty and staff are integral to this
learning
community; that diversity and respect for difference is our advantage,
and that
the strength that they have shown in continuing to educate others about
their
community in the face of these difficulties has benefited us all.
The
University has worked with student groups to develop the plans for a
multi-faith centre that will provide an appropriate permanent location
for
Muslim students, as well as the many other faith communities on our
campus. I
am pleased that construction on this facility will commence this
summer.
I
am proud of the way that Muslim students on campus have joined forces
with
other groups, most notably Hillel, to challenge ethno-cultural
stereotyping and
actions that promote intolerance. In many ways, these two communities
have
provided a model of bridge building for all of us to pursue further.
I
also want to thank a great many people in the Administration, in our
faculties
and within our student bodies who devote themselves, daily, to fighting
racism
and building equity.
The University's Values
Some
have asked how the University applies the principle of free expression
in the
current climate.
Let me say very specifically that the University will not tolerate
actions that
appear to rise to the level of a hate crime, or for that matter, any
criminal
act. We have worked and will continue to work to protect the victims,
to
investigate these events quickly and thoroughly, and to forward any
evidence to
the Toronto Police for their prosecution where evidence exists to
support a
conviction.
I
would add that incidents targeting individuals on the basis of their
identity
-- even if they do not rise to the level of an actual crime --
also
cause us grave concern, because they undermine the basic purpose of
this
learning community.
Of
course, the principle of free expression is a cornerstone of free
academies in
democratic societies. No university embracing that principle can ban
legal
expressions of opinion. Indeed, as we have noted before, every member
of the
University community should be prepared to confront opinions they find
morally
offensive.
Nonetheless,
any action undertaken for the sole purpose of causing distress to other
members
of the University of
Toronto undermines the basic purpose of this
learning community. Our purpose
is to advance knowledge through teaching and research in an environment
of
inclusiveness and respect. Intolerance is a destructive distraction
from that
goal. It thus has no moral place at this University, even when
expressed
through means that are protected by the principle of free expression.
To
repeat: There will be offensive expressions that we cannot suppress or
censor
because of our respect for the core value of free speech on our campus
and in
our society. But I want to serve notice that this Administration will
not
hesitate to communicate its concerns to those who seek not to promote a
dialogue, but to posture as demagogues.
Beyond
all of these considerations, any action that threatens the physical
safety and
well-being of University members or of visitors to our campuses is
absolutely
intolerable. Every member of the U of T community is responsible for
ensuring
an environment in which their peers and guests feel safe and welcome.
And, I
assure you that this administration will continue to focus on ensuring
the
safety of all our campuses.
The Path Ahead
Let
me summarize: The University of Toronto will continue to uphold the
principle
of free expression -- even, at times, to a degree that may be
uncomfortable in
broader society -- because it is the cornerstone of our daily work.
In
so doing, we expect all members of this community to be mindful of the
fine
line between discourse that is
provocatively reasonable and that which is
unreasonably provocative because it targets individuals on the basis of
their
identity. Racism and discrimination on the basis of religion or
ethno-cultural
identity are unacceptable on our three campuses.
To that end, we will also continue to devote major resources to
strengthening
the culture of inclusiveness and respect for differences that already
characterizes so much of our University. In that effort, I remain
grateful for
the contributions of countless members of our learning community who,
in their
everyday interactions with each other, uphold the principle that equity
and
diversity are essential prerequisites for the long-term success of this
great
University.
David Naylor is President of
the University of Toronto.
March
23, 2006.
Return
to Issues/Cases