TRENT LEADS IN RECOGNITION OF
INDIGENOUS KNOWLEDGE
CAUT Bulletin
Penni Stewart
June, 2010
As my Trent University colleague David Newhouse
put it, last month, the university did itself proud. The occasion was senate
approval of a new vision statement for the university. The outcome of a
year-long process of discussion and reflection, the vision says that: “We
foster an environment where Indigenous knowledge is respected and
recognized as valid means by which to understand the world.”
This was another in a long series of “firsts” for Trent, which in 1969
established itself as a leader in indigenous education with the creation of
an “Indian-Eskimo Studies Program,” the first such program in Canada. That
was the tumultuous year in the history of First Nations people when the
Trudeau government brought forward a white paper on First Nations, proposing
to end treaty rights, scrap the Indian Act and pursue a policy of
assimilation. First Nations communities were outraged and the white paper
became the subject of aboriginal leader Harold Cardinal’s “Unjust Society,”
a work credited with reversing the government’s position. The call for First
Nations control over education followed within a few years of Cardinal’s
book.
In 1972, Trent’s program was renamed the Department of Native Studies and
more recently the department changed its name to Indigenous Studies. Along
the way the university established the first BA and BA (Hons) in aboriginal
studies, the first MA, the first indigenous environmental studies program,
and, latterly, the first indigenous studies PhD program.
Trent is at the forefront of indigenous education not only in degree
programs, but also its vision of a curriculum that places indigenous
knowledge at its centre. Prof. Newhouse, chair of indigenous studies, has
described indigenous knowledge as including: “theories of the universe and
how it works; the nature of human beings and others; the nature of society
and political order; the nature of the world and how to live within it, and
human motivation, among many other aspects of life.”
Acquiring indigenous knowledge is not straightforward in the usual academic
sense. You cannot just read about it. Learning indigenous knowledge requires
cultural immersion and this has been provided at Trent through the inclusion
of Elders as teachers. Elders provide the bridge between aboriginal
communities and students both aboriginal and non aboriginal. As community
historians they bring indigenous oral traditions into the classroom.
At both the undergraduate and graduate level, students are given the
opportunity to learn from Elders outside of the classroom. In the doctoral
program students have the option of spending a term working under the
supervision of an Elder. And several distinguished indigenous knowledge
scholars have been appointed to the faculty on the basis of their cultural
credentials.
Another unique aspect of indigenous studies at Trent is that appointment,
tenure and promotion criteria and procedures clearly validate indigenous
knowledge and methods. For academic staff across the country who are
concerned with issues of equity and inclusion, Trent has, for a long time,
set the standard in tenure and promotion to which others aspire.
Candidates for tenure in indigenous studies at Trent can meet the tenure
requirements as “a conventional academic scholar,” an “academic with a
background in traditional aboriginal knowledge” (as is the case for many
Elders), or as a “dual tradition” scholar. Traditional knowledge is
recognized as knowledge usually acquired outside of the university and
scholarly credentials may be other than advanced degrees or papers published
in journals.
Assessing scholarly competence for those in the traditional aboriginal
knowledge stream requires a broad understanding of the accomplishments of
indigenous know-ledge scholars, including activities such as participation
in ceremonies. Significantly, there is recognition that assessments must
ensure indigenous scholars are evaluated by peers who may include members of
the “relevant cultural community” as well as members of the department.
Two years ago the Trent administration withdrew support for appointing
Elders to tenure track positions. Despite the concerns voiced by academic
staff and the faculty association, the issue remains unresolved. Ending
these appointments would be a serious blow to indigenous studies. Tenure for
Elders recognizes their integral role as knowledge creators as well as
knowledge transmitters. It institutionalizes the role of Elders and
signifies their place in the academy, and provides continuity for both
program and students.
Earlier this year CAUT executive director James Turk and I, along with Prof.
Newhouse and Trent University Faculty Association president Susan Wurtele,
met with Steven Franklin, the recently-appointed president of Trent
University. Our message for Franklin was about the importance of the
university’s indigenous studies program to aboriginal education in Canada.
We urged him to maintain Trent’s position at the forefront of aboriginal
education programs by renewing the university’s commitment to the practice
of tenure track appointments based on traditional aboriginal knowledge.
Making genuine space for indigenous scholars and researchers in the
university is a challenge to all of us in the academy. That’s why Trent’s
new vision statement is inspirational.